Abstract: This article explores the concept of Benign Hindu Imperialism, drawing upon the philosophical underpinnings of Benoy Kumar Sarkar and M.S. Golwalkar, to argue for its relevance and necessity in today’s global landscape. Unlike traditional forms of imperialism, Benign Hindu Imperialism, rooted in the tenets of Hindutva as proposed by Golwalkar in “Bunch of Thoughts,” advocates for a world where diverse thoughts and cultures coexist under the umbrella of Hindu philosophical inclusivity. This article contends that such an approach could foster global harmony, respect for pluralism, and mutual growth, especially in the face of rising cultural and ideological conflicts. The imminent potential third term of a Hindutva-led government in India positions the nation uniquely to champion this form of imperialism through nuanced diplomacy and international relations, not as a hegemonic force, but as a beacon of cultural synthesis and peaceful coexistence.
Introduction: The world today stands at the crossroads of cultural amalgamation and ideological conflicts, making the search for a unifying yet pluralistic approach more crucial than ever. Enter the concept of Benign Hindu Imperialism, a philosophy that, far from advocating for dominion or conversion, suggests an embrace of all-encompassing inclusivity and respect for diverse perspectives. Drawing insights from Benoy Kumar Sarkar’s emphasis on cultural synthesis and M.S. Golwalkar’s vision of a harmonious global society rooted in Hindu thought, this article delineates why and how Benign Hindu Imperialism could serve as a salutary force in the contemporary global milieu.
The Philosophical Backbone: Benoy Kumar Sarkar, a luminary in the realm of sociology and nationalism, laid the groundwork for understanding the cross-cultural synthesis, emphasizing the importance of learning from and integrating with global cultures while retaining a distinct cultural identity. His ideas provide a foundational ethos for Benign Hindu Imperialism, suggesting that the strength of Hindu philosophy lies in its adaptability and acceptance.
M.S. Golwalkar took these ideas further in “Bunch of Thoughts,” articulating a vision of Hindutva not as a narrow religious dogma but as a cultural and civilizational ethos that could encompass the diverse tapestry of human thought and society. Golwalkar’s Hindutva is predicated on the belief in universal brotherhood and the inherent divinity of all beings, advocating for a world where diverse cultures and ideologies can thrive under the aegis of Hindu philosophical thought.
Why the World Needs Benign Hindu Imperialism
The contemporary global landscape is marred by the vestiges of ideological rigidity and the calamities born out of attempts to homogenize human thought and culture. Historical and modern instances across various geopolitical spectrums reveal the catastrophic outcomes of imposing singular ideologies, be it religious, economic, or political, on diverse populations. The pursuit of such ideological purity, whether under the banners of Islam, Christianity, Communism, or Capitalism, has often led to conflicts, persecutions, and wars, with the cost measured in countless human lives and suffering.
Historical Context and Contemporary Relevance: The Crusades and the Islamic conquests are poignant examples from history where religious ideologies aimed at expanding their sphere of influence led to prolonged periods of war, loss of life, and cultural devastation. Similarly, the 20th century witnessed the ideological conflicts between Communism and Capitalism, most notably epitomized by the Cold War, which, while not always erupting into direct military conflict, caused numerous proxy wars, political upheavals, and social unrest across the globe. These events underline a pattern where ideological rigidity and the refusal to accommodate diversity have precipitated widespread human suffering and environmental degradation.
The Environmental and Social Impact: Moreover, the relentless pursuit of capitalist growth models has contributed to environmental degradation, exacerbating climate change and biodiversity loss, which pose existential threats to humanity. The dogmatic adherence to economic systems without regard to environmental sustainability or equitable wealth distribution has showcased the limitations and dangers of a one-size-fits-all approach to human development and prosperity.
Hindutva: A Pluralistic Alternative: In contrast, the philosophy of Hindutva, as envisioned by thinkers like M.S. Golwalkar and reflected in the ethos of Benign Hindu Imperialism, offers a fundamentally different paradigm. Hindutva, in its essence, does not seek to proselytize or impose a uniform way of life. Instead, it champions the idea of “Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam” — the world is one family. This ancient Hindu concept emphasizes the interconnectedness of all beings and advocates for a world where diverse cultures, beliefs, and economic systems can coexist and enrich each other. Hindutva proposes a civilizational approach that values diversity, encourages dialogue, and promotes mutual respect and understanding among different communities.
Implementing Benign Hindu Imperialism: The implementation of Benign Hindu Imperialism on a global scale would require a nuanced understanding of local cultures and traditions, ensuring that the principles of respect, inclusivity, and environmental stewardship are upheld. Through diplomatic engagement, international cooperation, and cultural exchange, a Hindutva-led India could demonstrate the practicality and benefits of this approach. By prioritizing peaceful coexistence, sustainable development, and respect for diverse cultural and religious identities, Benign Hindu Imperialism could pave the way for a more harmonious and sustainable world.
The historical record of ideological rigidity, with its attendant loss of life and environmental destruction, underscores the need for an alternative model of global engagement. Hindutva, with its core principles of universal brotherhood, respect for diversity, and ecological consciousness, presents a compelling alternative. In an age of global challenges and interdependence, Benign Hindu Imperialism emerges not as a call for dominance but as a plea for understanding, mutual respect, and collaboration towards a shared future. This philosophical shift towards inclusivity and pluralism could be the key to addressing the multifaceted crises facing humanity today.
The Role of India’s Hindutva Government
The potential third term of a Hindutva-led government in India signifies not just a continuation of its domestic policy trajectory but also an unprecedented opportunity to reshape its role on the global stage through the lens of Benign Hindu Imperialism. This concept, deeply rooted in the principles of inclusivity, mutual respect, and global harmony, offers a fresh perspective on how India can engage with the world, transcending traditional paradigms of power politics and economic hegemonies to champion a more equitable and understanding world order.
PTI
India, with its rich tapestry of cultures, religions, and languages, has long been a living testament to the possibility of diverse coexistence. The Hindutva government, drawing from this legacy and guided by the philosophical underpinnings of thinkers like M.S. Golwalkar and Benoy Kumar Sarkar, can leverage this unique position to advocate for a global society that mirrors this pluralism and inclusivity. Such advocacy would not only redefine India’s diplomatic and cultural engagements but also position it as a beacon of peace and stability in an increasingly fragmented world.
In practical terms, this could manifest through a variety of channels. Diplomatically, India could spearhead initiatives at international forums like the United Nations to foster dialogue and understanding across civilizational divides, proposing resolutions and frameworks that prioritize cultural empathy and cooperation over competition. Economically, it could champion models of development that respect ecological balance and cultural heritage, offering an alternative to the extractive and often exploitative practices that have characterized global capitalism.
Culturally, India’s rich heritage offers endless opportunities for soft power diplomacy. By promoting yoga, Ayurveda, and other aspects of Indian spirituality and wellbeing, which are intrinsically linked to the principles of Hindutva, India can offer the world holistic approaches to health and happiness that transcend material wealth. Furthermore, India’s film industry, literature, and arts can serve as conduits for sharing the values of unity in diversity, peace, and brotherhood with a global audience, fostering a deeper, emotional connection with the principles of Benign Hindu Imperialism.
At the heart of these endeavors would be the guiding principle that true strength comes from the ability to respect, include, and learn from one another. This does not mean a dilution of India’s interests or its cultural identity. On the contrary, it represents the confidence of a civilization that has thrived on synthesis and adaptation, ready to share its wisdom while equally eager to learn from the global community.
Moreover, the Hindutva government’s emphasis on national security and robust defense policies aligns with the need for a stable foundation upon which the ideals of Benign Hindu Imperialism can be promoted. A strong, secure India is better positioned to advocate for peace and cooperation, demonstrating that respect for sovereignty and territorial integrity goes hand in hand with cultural and economic collaboration.
As India potentially gears up for another term under Hindutva leadership, the world watches with interest. This period presents a unique moment in history for India to redefine its legacy – not as a regional power but as a global visionary, championing a form of imperialism that is anything but coercive, one that seeks to bind the world not in chains but in a web of mutual respect, understanding, and shared prosperity. The role of India’s Hindutva government, therefore, transcends the mere administration of a country; it embodies the potential to lead humanity towards a future where differences are not just tolerated but celebrated, where competition gives way to collaboration, and where the ancient ideal of Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam finds its fullest expression in the global arena.
Conclusion: The embrace of Benign Hindu Imperialism under the aegis of Hindutva philosophy heralds a transformative era for India and potentially for the global order. This philosophical and political recalibration, championing inclusivity, respect for diversity, and an ethos of global harmony, reaches its apotheosis under the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Modi’s ascension to power in 2014 marked a paradigmatic shift in India’s governance and its approach to both domestic and international engagements. Unlike the preceding eras of governance, particularly under the Congress party, where the shadow of colonial influence lingered over policy and orientation, Modi’s leadership has been quintessentially Indian in ethos, thought, and action.
The period of Congress rule post-1947, despite its significant contributions to the nation’s early years, often faced criticism for what some perceived as a continuation of colonial legacies and dependencies in governance, policy-making, and even in the psyche of the nation. Critics argue that the British left India physically in 1947, but their influence persisted, subtly guiding the newborn nation through proxies like the Congress party. This perceived continuity of colonial influence meant that, in the eyes of these critics, India’s governance and developmental trajectory remained tethered to Western paradigms and priorities, often at the expense of indigenous values and interests.
In stark contrast, Narendra Modi’s leadership has been celebrated for its distinct departure from this legacy. Modi is lauded for operating not on Greenwich Mean Time but on Indian Standard Time, both literally and metaphorically. His governance reflects a deep-rooted connection to Indian ethos, culture, and priorities, driven by a vision deeply embedded in the country’s ancient wisdom and contemporary aspirations. Modi’s tenure has been characterized by a significant emphasis on cultural revivalism, economic nationalism, and a strong stance on national security, all framed within the broader context of Hindutva philosophy.
Modi’s policies and initiatives, from the promotion of yoga on the international stage to the aggressive pursuit of economic self-reliance through the Make in India campaign, reflect a governance ethos that is distinctly Indian. His leadership has endeavored to recalibrate India’s position in the global order, not as a follower of Western paradigms but as a confident, independent voice advocating for a multipolar world. Modi’s approach to diplomacy and international relations, grounded in the principle of mutual respect and benefit, seeks to establish India as a global leader that champions a new kind of imperialism – one that is benign, inclusive, and rooted in the ancient principle of Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam (the world is one family).
This shift towards a governance model that prioritizes Indian values and interests over inherited colonial legacies represents a significant departure from the past. It signals a renaissance of India’s cultural and philosophical contributions to the world, underpinned by a leadership that is attuned to the nation’s ethos and the aspirations of its people.
The conclusion, therefore, is not just a reflection on the philosophical merits of Benign Hindu Imperialism or the strategic advantages of a Hindutva-led governance model. It is also an acknowledgment of a leadership style embodied by Narendra Modi, which has sought to reconnect India with its roots and project its values onto the global stage. As India continues on this trajectory, the promise of a leadership and governance model that truly reflects the aspirations and ethos of its people offers a beacon of hope not just for India but for the possibility of a more inclusive and respectful global community. This transformation, rooted in the depth of India’s civilizational heritage and the vision of its current leadership, has the potential to redefine not only India’s place in the world but also the very principles that guide global governance and international relations.
As an educator deeply passionate about the nuances of law and governance, I find immense joy in reading classic literature in Political Theory and various disciplines within Humanities and Social Sciences. Through my blog, I aim to share this enthusiasm by reviewing and analyzing these works, offering insights that bridge the gap between theory and practice.
My journey as an educator, with degrees in law, political science, and an MPhil in Defense and Strategic Studies, has instilled in me a profound commitment to imparting knowledge. Beyond the confines of the classroom, my work is driven by a sense of duty and service, striving to inspire the next generation to apply their learning ethically and meaningfully. Through my writings, I seek to enrich discussions on current political events, blending academic rigor with practical relevance, thereby contributing to a deeper understanding of the complexities of law and society.
The Essential Cog 
Towards a Harmonious World: Reimagining Global Unity Through the Prism of Benign Hindu Imperialism
Abstract: This article explores the concept of Benign Hindu Imperialism, drawing upon the philosophical underpinnings of Benoy Kumar Sarkar and M.S. Golwalkar, to argue for its relevance and necessity in today’s global landscape. Unlike traditional forms of imperialism, Benign Hindu Imperialism, rooted in the tenets of Hindutva as proposed by Golwalkar in “Bunch of Thoughts,” advocates for a world where diverse thoughts and cultures coexist under the umbrella of Hindu philosophical inclusivity. This article contends that such an approach could foster global harmony, respect for pluralism, and mutual growth, especially in the face of rising cultural and ideological conflicts. The imminent potential third term of a Hindutva-led government in India positions the nation uniquely to champion this form of imperialism through nuanced diplomacy and international relations, not as a hegemonic force, but as a beacon of cultural synthesis and peaceful coexistence.
Introduction: The world today stands at the crossroads of cultural amalgamation and ideological conflicts, making the search for a unifying yet pluralistic approach more crucial than ever. Enter the concept of Benign Hindu Imperialism, a philosophy that, far from advocating for dominion or conversion, suggests an embrace of all-encompassing inclusivity and respect for diverse perspectives. Drawing insights from Benoy Kumar Sarkar’s emphasis on cultural synthesis and M.S. Golwalkar’s vision of a harmonious global society rooted in Hindu thought, this article delineates why and how Benign Hindu Imperialism could serve as a salutary force in the contemporary global milieu.
The Philosophical Backbone: Benoy Kumar Sarkar, a luminary in the realm of sociology and nationalism, laid the groundwork for understanding the cross-cultural synthesis, emphasizing the importance of learning from and integrating with global cultures while retaining a distinct cultural identity. His ideas provide a foundational ethos for Benign Hindu Imperialism, suggesting that the strength of Hindu philosophy lies in its adaptability and acceptance.
M.S. Golwalkar took these ideas further in “Bunch of Thoughts,” articulating a vision of Hindutva not as a narrow religious dogma but as a cultural and civilizational ethos that could encompass the diverse tapestry of human thought and society. Golwalkar’s Hindutva is predicated on the belief in universal brotherhood and the inherent divinity of all beings, advocating for a world where diverse cultures and ideologies can thrive under the aegis of Hindu philosophical thought.
Why the World Needs Benign Hindu Imperialism
The contemporary global landscape is marred by the vestiges of ideological rigidity and the calamities born out of attempts to homogenize human thought and culture. Historical and modern instances across various geopolitical spectrums reveal the catastrophic outcomes of imposing singular ideologies, be it religious, economic, or political, on diverse populations. The pursuit of such ideological purity, whether under the banners of Islam, Christianity, Communism, or Capitalism, has often led to conflicts, persecutions, and wars, with the cost measured in countless human lives and suffering.
Historical Context and Contemporary Relevance: The Crusades and the Islamic conquests are poignant examples from history where religious ideologies aimed at expanding their sphere of influence led to prolonged periods of war, loss of life, and cultural devastation. Similarly, the 20th century witnessed the ideological conflicts between Communism and Capitalism, most notably epitomized by the Cold War, which, while not always erupting into direct military conflict, caused numerous proxy wars, political upheavals, and social unrest across the globe. These events underline a pattern where ideological rigidity and the refusal to accommodate diversity have precipitated widespread human suffering and environmental degradation.
The Environmental and Social Impact: Moreover, the relentless pursuit of capitalist growth models has contributed to environmental degradation, exacerbating climate change and biodiversity loss, which pose existential threats to humanity. The dogmatic adherence to economic systems without regard to environmental sustainability or equitable wealth distribution has showcased the limitations and dangers of a one-size-fits-all approach to human development and prosperity.
Hindutva: A Pluralistic Alternative: In contrast, the philosophy of Hindutva, as envisioned by thinkers like M.S. Golwalkar and reflected in the ethos of Benign Hindu Imperialism, offers a fundamentally different paradigm. Hindutva, in its essence, does not seek to proselytize or impose a uniform way of life. Instead, it champions the idea of “Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam” — the world is one family. This ancient Hindu concept emphasizes the interconnectedness of all beings and advocates for a world where diverse cultures, beliefs, and economic systems can coexist and enrich each other. Hindutva proposes a civilizational approach that values diversity, encourages dialogue, and promotes mutual respect and understanding among different communities.
Implementing Benign Hindu Imperialism: The implementation of Benign Hindu Imperialism on a global scale would require a nuanced understanding of local cultures and traditions, ensuring that the principles of respect, inclusivity, and environmental stewardship are upheld. Through diplomatic engagement, international cooperation, and cultural exchange, a Hindutva-led India could demonstrate the practicality and benefits of this approach. By prioritizing peaceful coexistence, sustainable development, and respect for diverse cultural and religious identities, Benign Hindu Imperialism could pave the way for a more harmonious and sustainable world.
The historical record of ideological rigidity, with its attendant loss of life and environmental destruction, underscores the need for an alternative model of global engagement. Hindutva, with its core principles of universal brotherhood, respect for diversity, and ecological consciousness, presents a compelling alternative. In an age of global challenges and interdependence, Benign Hindu Imperialism emerges not as a call for dominance but as a plea for understanding, mutual respect, and collaboration towards a shared future. This philosophical shift towards inclusivity and pluralism could be the key to addressing the multifaceted crises facing humanity today.
The Role of India’s Hindutva Government
The potential third term of a Hindutva-led government in India signifies not just a continuation of its domestic policy trajectory but also an unprecedented opportunity to reshape its role on the global stage through the lens of Benign Hindu Imperialism. This concept, deeply rooted in the principles of inclusivity, mutual respect, and global harmony, offers a fresh perspective on how India can engage with the world, transcending traditional paradigms of power politics and economic hegemonies to champion a more equitable and understanding world order.
India, with its rich tapestry of cultures, religions, and languages, has long been a living testament to the possibility of diverse coexistence. The Hindutva government, drawing from this legacy and guided by the philosophical underpinnings of thinkers like M.S. Golwalkar and Benoy Kumar Sarkar, can leverage this unique position to advocate for a global society that mirrors this pluralism and inclusivity. Such advocacy would not only redefine India’s diplomatic and cultural engagements but also position it as a beacon of peace and stability in an increasingly fragmented world.
In practical terms, this could manifest through a variety of channels. Diplomatically, India could spearhead initiatives at international forums like the United Nations to foster dialogue and understanding across civilizational divides, proposing resolutions and frameworks that prioritize cultural empathy and cooperation over competition. Economically, it could champion models of development that respect ecological balance and cultural heritage, offering an alternative to the extractive and often exploitative practices that have characterized global capitalism.
Culturally, India’s rich heritage offers endless opportunities for soft power diplomacy. By promoting yoga, Ayurveda, and other aspects of Indian spirituality and wellbeing, which are intrinsically linked to the principles of Hindutva, India can offer the world holistic approaches to health and happiness that transcend material wealth. Furthermore, India’s film industry, literature, and arts can serve as conduits for sharing the values of unity in diversity, peace, and brotherhood with a global audience, fostering a deeper, emotional connection with the principles of Benign Hindu Imperialism.
At the heart of these endeavors would be the guiding principle that true strength comes from the ability to respect, include, and learn from one another. This does not mean a dilution of India’s interests or its cultural identity. On the contrary, it represents the confidence of a civilization that has thrived on synthesis and adaptation, ready to share its wisdom while equally eager to learn from the global community.
Moreover, the Hindutva government’s emphasis on national security and robust defense policies aligns with the need for a stable foundation upon which the ideals of Benign Hindu Imperialism can be promoted. A strong, secure India is better positioned to advocate for peace and cooperation, demonstrating that respect for sovereignty and territorial integrity goes hand in hand with cultural and economic collaboration.
As India potentially gears up for another term under Hindutva leadership, the world watches with interest. This period presents a unique moment in history for India to redefine its legacy – not as a regional power but as a global visionary, championing a form of imperialism that is anything but coercive, one that seeks to bind the world not in chains but in a web of mutual respect, understanding, and shared prosperity. The role of India’s Hindutva government, therefore, transcends the mere administration of a country; it embodies the potential to lead humanity towards a future where differences are not just tolerated but celebrated, where competition gives way to collaboration, and where the ancient ideal of Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam finds its fullest expression in the global arena.
Conclusion: The embrace of Benign Hindu Imperialism under the aegis of Hindutva philosophy heralds a transformative era for India and potentially for the global order. This philosophical and political recalibration, championing inclusivity, respect for diversity, and an ethos of global harmony, reaches its apotheosis under the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Modi’s ascension to power in 2014 marked a paradigmatic shift in India’s governance and its approach to both domestic and international engagements. Unlike the preceding eras of governance, particularly under the Congress party, where the shadow of colonial influence lingered over policy and orientation, Modi’s leadership has been quintessentially Indian in ethos, thought, and action.
The period of Congress rule post-1947, despite its significant contributions to the nation’s early years, often faced criticism for what some perceived as a continuation of colonial legacies and dependencies in governance, policy-making, and even in the psyche of the nation. Critics argue that the British left India physically in 1947, but their influence persisted, subtly guiding the newborn nation through proxies like the Congress party. This perceived continuity of colonial influence meant that, in the eyes of these critics, India’s governance and developmental trajectory remained tethered to Western paradigms and priorities, often at the expense of indigenous values and interests.
In stark contrast, Narendra Modi’s leadership has been celebrated for its distinct departure from this legacy. Modi is lauded for operating not on Greenwich Mean Time but on Indian Standard Time, both literally and metaphorically. His governance reflects a deep-rooted connection to Indian ethos, culture, and priorities, driven by a vision deeply embedded in the country’s ancient wisdom and contemporary aspirations. Modi’s tenure has been characterized by a significant emphasis on cultural revivalism, economic nationalism, and a strong stance on national security, all framed within the broader context of Hindutva philosophy.
Modi’s policies and initiatives, from the promotion of yoga on the international stage to the aggressive pursuit of economic self-reliance through the Make in India campaign, reflect a governance ethos that is distinctly Indian. His leadership has endeavored to recalibrate India’s position in the global order, not as a follower of Western paradigms but as a confident, independent voice advocating for a multipolar world. Modi’s approach to diplomacy and international relations, grounded in the principle of mutual respect and benefit, seeks to establish India as a global leader that champions a new kind of imperialism – one that is benign, inclusive, and rooted in the ancient principle of Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam (the world is one family).
This shift towards a governance model that prioritizes Indian values and interests over inherited colonial legacies represents a significant departure from the past. It signals a renaissance of India’s cultural and philosophical contributions to the world, underpinned by a leadership that is attuned to the nation’s ethos and the aspirations of its people.
The conclusion, therefore, is not just a reflection on the philosophical merits of Benign Hindu Imperialism or the strategic advantages of a Hindutva-led governance model. It is also an acknowledgment of a leadership style embodied by Narendra Modi, which has sought to reconnect India with its roots and project its values onto the global stage. As India continues on this trajectory, the promise of a leadership and governance model that truly reflects the aspirations and ethos of its people offers a beacon of hope not just for India but for the possibility of a more inclusive and respectful global community. This transformation, rooted in the depth of India’s civilizational heritage and the vision of its current leadership, has the potential to redefine not only India’s place in the world but also the very principles that guide global governance and international relations.
Share this:
About Sathyanarayanan D
As an educator deeply passionate about the nuances of law and governance, I find immense joy in reading classic literature in Political Theory and various disciplines within Humanities and Social Sciences. Through my blog, I aim to share this enthusiasm by reviewing and analyzing these works, offering insights that bridge the gap between theory and practice. My journey as an educator, with degrees in law, political science, and an MPhil in Defense and Strategic Studies, has instilled in me a profound commitment to imparting knowledge. Beyond the confines of the classroom, my work is driven by a sense of duty and service, striving to inspire the next generation to apply their learning ethically and meaningfully. Through my writings, I seek to enrich discussions on current political events, blending academic rigor with practical relevance, thereby contributing to a deeper understanding of the complexities of law and society.